On
18 October 1867, Russia handed over their colony of Alaska to the
United States. Instrumental in the purchase, Secretary of State William
Henry Seward saw the territory as a connection to Asian markets and a
chance to put pressure on British Columbia. He saw this as his greatest
personal achievement, but realized that it would not be appreciated in
his lifetime. To him, holding these territories would lead to control
of the Pacific. It was agreed that a display of military force was
needed to prove American superiority to the natives that came with the
property; there were about 2,000 whites compared to around 25,000
aboriginals. Since the end of the Civil War, the size of army had
decreased from its wartime strength of 1.5 million to less than 30,000
soldiers. Accordingly, not much of this already small manpower would be
sent to the defense of the new possession. With the main Army base on
Kiska Island, there was no garrison assigned
to the Aleutians, the
closet being Kodiak island. A budget cut in 1870 lead to the close of
all bases except the one on
Kiska, which
itself was closed in 1877. For
the next twenty years, the only military presence in Alaska was for
geographical surveying. When gold was discovered in the Yukon territory
in 1897, American military returned to deal with the threat of disorder
due to the rush of people from all over with dreams of quick
prosperity. By 1900 there were more than twelve posts set up through
the vast territory. In February of 1904, the Russo-Japanese War
threatened to complicate matters. Friendly relations had existed with
Japan since Commodore Mathew Perry's good will trip in 1853, so the
Japanese were confident that we would stay neutral. Further
complications arose from our acquisitions of Hawaii and the
Philippines, the latter of these by force, however the Japanese still
believed that we would not deploy the bulk of our fleet to the Pacific.
In 1911, the Navy considered
three options in case of the need to counter a Japanese attack: first,
from the North via the Aleutians to Okinawa; second, an attack from
Hawaii or Guam; and finally, up from the Philippines. It was argued
that a campaign from the Philippines would take too long and that
Kiska
was not big enough to be effective and that it was too close to Japan
and thus vulnerable to attack. Despite fervent argument from Admiral
Alfred Thayer Mahan, who believed that complications that would arise
with the Aleutian option could be overcome, the Naval War Board decided
to put the main fleet in Hawaii with only a few cruiser scouts alloted
to the Aleutians.
While the First World War put
talks of Alaska on the back-burner, Army War College professor R.M.
Johnson proposed 20,000 troops be stationed in Hawaii and Alaska to
protect against Japanese invasion of the territories. However, in 1922
the Washington Naval Treaty was signed, and in Article XIX of the
agreement, the construction of new bases, and even the improvement of
existing bases, in Alaska and the Aleutians was forbidden. Even so, as
anti-American sentiment grew in the Japanese Navy, Americans began to
look at options in the Aleutians. Hector C. Bywater published a paper
in 1925 saying that Americans could defeat the Japanese in a war, and
that the utilization of the Aleutians would play a key role. Bywater,
however, failed to convince people of his point. The American prophet
of aviation, Brigadier General Billy Mitchell, was better placed to be
influential. BGen Mitchell sought to prove the importance of aviation
in future conflicts and secure an independent American air service.
Opposed to the Washington treaty, believing that increasing American
trade interest in Asia and rampant racism toward Japanese immigrants in
the U.S. made a war with Japan inevitable, Mitchell argued that planes
flying from the Aleutians could level Tokyo. Citing Canada's
proximity to Alaska as prove that our neighbors would be our natural
allies in any plans to fortify that area against a Japanese attack, the
pilot organized a test flight to prove the worth of the islands.
Unfortunately for Mitchell and other Aleutian advocates, the flight
failed to convince anyone. Weather in the area was, at best, bad, and
by 1934 Canada was only assured further that it didn't want part in
Americans
activities in the region. For the time being, the Aleutian Islands
would take a back seat to other affairs. (Perras)
By Daniel Chiriboga and Kristi Reule