![]() | |||
| |||
2007 Paul A. McLennon, Sr. Honors Moot Court CompetitionSpring 2007
Tournament Coordinators: Sara Vokshori & Ana Yeager
2007 Tournament ResultsFinishers: Best Brief - Petitioner: Best Brief - Respondent: Best Oralist Awards: Problem:
United States v. Afshari, 426 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2005), reh’g denied, 446 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2006) Petitioners, Hossein Afshari et al., were indicted for knowingly and willfully providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization, designated pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1189. Petitioners allege that 8 U.S.C. § 1189 violates the First Amendment because it prohibits them from challenging the foreign terrorist designation and does not provide adequate procedural safeguards to allow the prosecution of protected speech. Respondent, United States of America, argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1189 is constitutional because it adequately protects any alleged free speech rights. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that 8 U.S.C. § 1189 did not violate the First Amendment and reinstated the Petitioners’ indictments. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on whether there is a First Amendment right to challenge the designation and if 8 U.S.C. § 1189 impermissibly restricts speech. | |||
Copyright © 2008 University
of San Diego School of Law Appellate Moot Court Board.
|