Current List of Abtracts:
·
Joe Fiedler
(Thursday, June 30th, 1:30 pm – 5:30 pm)
Traditionally Mathematics courses treat uses of mathematics as an
afterthought relegated either to a section of "Applications" or
worse, "Word Problems."
Hand-held technologies that can collect, display, and analyze data offer
both an excuse and a reason to rethink the interaction between School
Mathematics and the World. In this
hands-on workshop we will see how empirical observations of Galileo and
·
Jane Friedman
(Wednesday, June 29th, 3:40 pm – 5:30 pm)
Title: Teaching Students
Mathematical
Session Description: Teaching students to read mathematics is an
essential first step in teaching students to understand and write proofs.
·
Ted Gamelin and
Heather Calahan
(Monday, June 27th, 1:30 pm – 3:00 pm)
Title: The Role of the Mathematics
Department in the Preparation of Future Teachers
Session Description: Our presentation will focus on the role that a
research mathematics department can play in the
undergraduate preparation of math teachers, and the shape that a mathematics
subject matter preparation program might take within a research mathematics
department. A critical ingredient of any such program is a capstone course. We
will discuss our experiences implementing a capstone course, which is co-taught
by mathematician and classroom teacher, and in particular our experiences with
course textbook and materials. We will also discuss various changes that can be
made in the syllabi for standard courses in order to make these courses more
relevant for pre-service teachers. Finally, we discuss the sources of support
(money) for our program, and our experiences dealing with state credentialing
bodies concerning waiver approval for our program.
·
Cathy Kessel
(Tuesday, June 21st, 1:30 pm – 5:30 pm)
Title: Observing classes,
interviewing students, discussing teaching and learning
Session Description: It is hard to discuss teaching and learning
without reference to observations of classrooms and students. These can vary
from a remark that a student made yesterday to the distilled experience from
years of teaching. The way in which observations are made can help to make them
more or less available for later discussion with others. This session will
focus on discussion and practice of classroom observations and student
interviews.
·
Magnhild
Lien
(Tuesday, June 21st, 10:45 am – 11:45 am)
Title: MET Report, National
and State Standards
Session Description: In this
session we will go over the main parts of the Conference Board of the
Mathematical Sciences’ report on the Mathematical Education of Teachers (MET)
as it pertains to the preparation of secondary level teachers. In addition we will discuss how mathematics
departments can use this report to enhance their programs to include an
appropriate track for prospective mathematics teachers.
·
Elena Anne
Marchisotto
(Tuesday, June 28th, 3:00 pm – 4:25 pm)
Title: Teaching Teachers How
to Teach Proofs
Session Description: I hate
proofs! How often do we hear our
students say this? In this presentation
I demonstrate strategies that I have found to produce a different
response. I will focus on geometry. My
approach helps students to understand the need for proof. It raises the question of what a geometry is, and fosters an appreciation of how proof
reveals the heart of the subject. I will use collaborative learning exercises
to illustrate ways to teach correct proving techniques and to use proof to give
a deeper understanding of geometry. I
will provide samples of discussion questions and problems and a list of
resources for related study.
· Roxy Peck
Session 1 (Thursday, June 30th, 8:30 am – 10:30 am)
Title: Statistics in the
Mathematics Curriculum—To Integrate or Differentiate?
Session Description: This session will explore what distinguishes
statistics from mathematics and will examine the role of statistics in the
secondary mathematics curriculum.
Relevant NCTM and
Session 2 (Thursday, June 30th, 10:45 am – 11:45 am)
Title: Some High Tech and Low
Tech Demonstrations: Teaching
Statistical Reasoning
Session Description: In this session, we will look at some hands-on
activities that develop statistical reasoning.
Demonstrations will include both “low tech” activities as well as those
that incorporate technology (using Fathom).
The Session will conclude with a discussion of available resources for
teachers of statistics.
·
Anthony
L. Peressini
(Tuesday, June 28th, 1:30 pm – 2:55 pm)
Title: Developing and
delivering web based professional development short courses for high school
mathematics teachers.
Session Description: Our Mathematics Department currently offers a series of professional development short courses through its Math Teacher Link (MTL) web site at: http://MTL.math.uiuc.edu/. The current offerings of short courses deal primarily with the integration of technology into the teaching of mathematics. I am currently developing some new MTL short courses that focus on useful mathematical content for teachers. My objective is to use dynamic and interactive web technology and web resources to explore and enhance the content presentation. This session will describe two of these new course modules in some detail. One of these short courses uses our book Mathematics for High School Teachers for a text. That presents a special challenge to me to develop the web portion of the course so that it complements and enhances rather than replaces the text presentation. I hope to engage the audience in a discussion the problems and opportunities associated with web-based professional development courses for mathematics teachers.
·
Dick
Stanley
Title: Delving Deeper
(Monday, June 27th, 3:15 pm - 5:30 pm)
Session Description: This session illustrates an approach to the
mathematical preparation of high school teachers that stays very close to high
school level content, but that treats this content in a mathematically
sophisticated way. The intent is to help teachers focus the kind of
mathematical maturity that their undergraduate courses make possible on the
actual content and problems of high school mathematics. Thus it treats high
school mathematics from an "advanced standpoint". Still, it does not
do this by appealing to higher levels of rigor or formality. Rather, it does so
through developing the idea of sophisticated use of simple tools.
This approach takes advantage of the fact that, implicit in
standard problems of the high school curriculum, there is an undercurrent of
deeper mathematics that is seldom brought out for teachers. Seeing how to carry
out deeper analyses of simple problems gives teachers a better appreciation of
the mathematical substance of the high school curriculum, and at the same time
helps them develop and use powerful mathematical ways of thinking.
·
Mark Hoover
Together with workshop participants, we will explore the content of
mathematics courses meant to prepare teachers.
We will introduce the idea of an applied
mathematics course for teaching and discuss ideas about what might be
included in such a course. We will also
consider ways of teaching mathematics so that prospective and practicing
teachers find it relevant to their work and so that they are better able to use
mathematics in their teaching.
Our sessions will mix presentations of research we have been doing
in this arena with discussions about what workshop participants do in, and want
to change about, the courses they currently teach. Together, we will design materials and
approaches to teaching mathematical
explanation and to using curriculum
materials in an applied mathematics course for teaching.
Session 1 (Wednesday, June 22nd, 1:30 pm – 5:30 pm)
Title: What Content Belongs
in Mathematics Courses for Teachers?
Session Description: We will begin by considering why we should
worry about teachers’ mathematical knowledge.
What’s the evidence that it matters?
And, what mathematics and in what ways do we think that mathematics
matters? After some initial framing of
these issues, we will hear from you about what you have tried and what you
would like to work on further. We will
also share with you distinctions among different types of mathematical
knowledge needed for teaching and will introduce a body of specialized content knowledge that we think is particularly appropriate
to include in mathematics courses for teachers.
In closing, we will argue that mathematical
practices, such as explaining or using representations, and mathematical tasks of teaching, such as
analyzing errors or interpreting student thinking, are important aspects of the
mathematical skill needed by teachers.
Session 2 (Wednesday, June 22nd, 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm)
Title:
Mathematical Practices Central to the Work of Teaching
Session Description: In this relaxed evening session, we will
explore mathematical practices key to effective teaching, such as giving
explanations, choosing appropriate definitions, and using mathematical
representations. To focus our
discussion, we will do some mathematics together and will watch some video of
classroom teaching. In each case, we
will ask what mathematical practices are and when and where they arise in the
work teaching.
Session 3 (Thursday, June 23rd, 1:30 pm – 3:30 pm)
Title: Mathematical
Explanation: What There Is to Teach and Ways to Teach It
Session Description: Having explored a range of mathematical
practices, we will now focus in on mathematical explanation. Using a videotaped interview of a calculus
student and video of mathematical explanation being taught in a university
mathematics course for teachers, we will refine our understanding of what
mathematical explanation is, what there is to teach, and how we might go about
teaching it.
Session 4 (Thursday, June 23rd, 3:30 pm – 5:30 pm)
Title: Using School
Curricula: Why and in What Ways
In this final session, we will explore ways of using school
curriculum materials in university mathematics courses for teachers, and we
will consider ways in which the mathematical work
teachers do as they size up, select, modify, and use school curricular
materials can be used to design mathematical activities for teachers. In conclusion, we will reflect on our work
over the two past days and discuss additional ideas for what might be included
in an applied mathematics course for teaching.