PATTERN
RECOGNITION & SENSORY MEMORY
-
PATTERN RECOGNITION is the ability to identify
objects in the environment--a necessary first step in all cognitive processses.
Incoming sensations are combined/compared with patterns stored in LTM.
-
It is related to SENSORY MEMORY, where incoming
stimuli are held for further processing following their initial detection.
TEMPLATE-MATCHING
MODELS
-
Template: exact internal representation of a
pattern to be recognized.
-
Incoming patterns are compared "as is" to existing,
stored patterns in LTM.
-
Example: a computer scanning the bottom numbers
on checks looks for an exact match, or the use of UPC codes.
-
Template-matching theory as a theory of pattern
recognition:
-
1.) assumes that a retinal
image is faithfully encoded in the brain.
-
2.) assumes that an attempt
is made to compare the retinal image directly to various stored patterns,
or templates.
-
3.) may be a mechanism for
the sensory register--allows extra time to hold information for processing,
but with a questionable application for real life--when do we have stimuli
changing every 250 ms on a consistent basis?
-
Problems with template matching theories:
-
1.) Requires an all or none
judgment.
-
2.) Gives no room for context.
-
3.) Symbols must always be
the same size, orientation position as the pattern to be identified.
-
4.) Things can go wrong with
the template--assumes a precise retinal image.
-
5.) Does not show how two
patterns may vary, e.g. P vs R, or E vs F
-
6.) Does not allow for alternate
descriptions of the pattern, e.g., sting ray versus sail--ambiguous stimuli.
-
7.) That a precise, standardized
system is needed for template matching to work reduces the credibility
of this process as a model for human pattern recognition, which is highly
complex and would require an almost infinite store of patterns.
-
8.) Very few researchers
today view template matching as an adequate model.
FEATURE
ANALYSIS MODELS
-
Feature analysis as a theory of pattern recognition:
-
1.) Requires the recognition
of critical features rather than reading an exact template.
-
Stimuli
are thought of as combinations of elemental features. Can describe a pattern
by listing its parts.
-
Like
bottom-up processing in that there is a feature-by-feature comparison.
Individual units are used to build a whole.
-
2.) Key component: contrasts/
differentiates between patterns and looks for distinctive features,
i.e., the lowest horizontal line in E, differentiate it from F.
-
Advantages over template matching:
-
1.) Features are simpler
units.
-
At the visual level there is strong evidence
that the nervous system indeed extracts such features as lines (e.g., Hubel
& Weisel, 1962).
-
2.) "Critical" features,
those relationships among features which are most critical to a pattern,
can
be identified: i.e., for the letter ‘A’ the critical point is that two
approximately 45-degree lines intersect as near to the top as possible
and the cross bar intersects both lines as nearly as possible, bisecting
both lines.
-
3.) Reduces the number of
stored units: you do not need a template for each possible pattern but
only for each feature. Since the same features tend to occur in many patterns
this would mean a considerable savings in storage.
-
4.) Sensitivity to context:
small variations in relationships can be overcome by taking account of
the context--top-down processing is taken into account-- expectations and
internal schemata play a part in perception.
-
5.) Problem: Fails to explain
relationships between features.
STRUCTURAL
THEORIES
-
A.)
Extend feature theories by specifying how features are related.
This is a follow-up step to feature identification.
-
B.)
Also called ‘analysis-by-synthesis’.
-
C.)
Makes use of Gestalt principles--rules for initial form organization. The
Gestalt principles seem to function so that one can quickly segment a stimulus
into a set of objects and to organize these objects into larger configurations.
-
In
some situations this segmentation seems quite successful: i.e., in a written
page the principle of proximity serves to identify the letters and words,
the principles of proximity and good continuation identify the line of
text.
-
Theoretically
more efficient than template models: They allow a single set of rules for
determining relations among features to apply to a wide range of objects
and scenes.
IMPORTANCE
OF CONTEXT OR TOP-DOWN PROCESSING
Context:
-
1.) The use of existing knowledge to guide processing.
-
2.) At the earliest, top down processing can
take place at the level of visual or auditory short term memory.
-
3.) Top-down processing becomes more important
as
you degrade bottom-up. We compare what we see with past experiences and
use this to interpret what is being seen.
Auditory example of verbal context
effect on pattern recognition
-
Have you seen the new display?
-
Have you seen the nudist play?
SENSORY
REGISTERS; VISUAL & ACOUSTIC STORES: OVERVIEW
-
There appear to be sensory registers, or stores,
which can hold incoming stimulus information for very short periods of
time. These sensory registers are a first step in establishing a more permanent
memory.
-
Each sensory system has its own, apparently
independent store:
-
Iconic (vision) Auditory (hearing)
-
Haptic (touch) Gustatory (taste)
-
Olfactory (smell)
THE
INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN BRIEF VISUAL PRESENTATIONS
-
Brief visual information is gathered by use
of a tachistoscope--stimuli can be viewed for a precise duration and a
brightness.
-
A.) The Span of Apprehension
-
the amount of information we can attend to at any one time. Defined
as 50% accuracy in detecting the information available in a visual display.
This amount is limited, and the limit can be assessed by using a t-scope.
-
B.) The Partial Report Procedure
-
Sperling
(1960) devised a procedure in which letters and numbers appeared in a 4
x 3 matrix. In a control, whole report condition, stimuli were exposed
and subjects reported as many letters and numbers as they could--average
was between 4 & 5.
-
This
suggests there is a limited ability which is linked to a perceptual limit.
-
In
the experimental, or partial report condition a tone of high, medium
or low pitch was sounded, cueing the subject to report the stimuli from
either the top, middle or bottom row.
-
All
three rows were randomly tested, and the results showed a mean recall of
3 stimuli per row--on any one trial 9 stimuli (3 x 3) were available
for recall, about twice as many as were available with whole report.
-
Thus,
there appears to be a brief visual sensory store which can hold a fair
amount of information but which is quickly lost if not immediately attended
to.
-
This
suggests there is a limited ability linked to a memory capacity limit.
-
The
question remains which is it: Perceptual or Mnemonic limit?
-
C.) Properties of Iconic
Memory
-
Iconic
memory is the name given to the visual sensory register--the memory for
a rapidly fading visual image.
-
Unlike
an afterimage, which is thought to be a retinal (eyeball) event, the icon
is thought to be a central (nervous system) event--thus making a true psychological
event and not a physiological one.
-
It
is short-lived, less than about 500 ms., and is limited to about 75% of
a display, or about 9 - 12 items, depending on the experimental paradigm.
-
It
is serial--processing is on an item-by-item basis.
-
It
is controlled--requires mental effort.
-
It
is limited to physical information, such as color, but not to higher cognitive
processes such as category membership.
-
It
is not conscious--all information enters the system.
ECHOIC
MEMORY
-
A.) Dichotic Listening
-
The
auditory sensory store has been inferred by the technique of dichotic
listening.
-
Subjects
wear stereo headphones through which different information is presented
to each ear, simultaneously. If you present three digits to the left ear
and three digits to the right ear simultaneously, then ask for recall,
subjects typically recall first all of the digits from one ear and then
all of the digits heard in the other.
-
This
implies that the second set must be held while the first is being recalled.
-
Another
dichotic technique involves shadowing, where a subject is presented
two different stories, one to each ear, and the subject is asked to repeat
aloud the story in one ear.
-
When
the two messages are identical, but offset, subjects become aware of that
fact when they shadow the leading message, with the nonshadowed message
offset by up to 13 words. When the shadowed message is the lagging one,
then subjects only become aware of them being identical when they are offset
by up to 6 words. This is evidence that there must be some brief storage
for the nonshadowed message as well.
-
B.) Partial Report
-
Darwin,
Turvey & Crowder (972) applied Sperling's partial report technique
to the auditory modality.
-
They
found that by cuing recall with a visual marker the partial report was
superior to the whole report.
-
For
whole report the span of auditory apprehension is between 4 and 5 items,
just as for the visual store. However, by partial report auditory apprehension
increased, even for delays up to 4 secs, although the increase was not
as large as for the visual technique.
-
The
findings suggest there is an auditory store in which echoic memory persists
longer than iconic memory, but which is more limited in its capacity.
-
C.) Word Superiority Effect:
-
Iconic
memory studies show that a letter is recognized more quickly when it is
part of a word than when it is considered by itself, or as a part of a
nonword.
-
This
suggests that prior knowledge about words leads us to expect particular
letters to appear in particular locations, providing evidence for interaction
between sensory and long term memory stores.
-
Also
provides evidence for a parallel processing model in which features, letters
and words are processed simultaneously.