|
C. Consumer Behavior
1. Consumer preferences
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
a. Assumptions about preferences
(1) Completeness
- Consumers can compare and rank all possible baskets
.
.
.
.
(2) Transitivity
.
.
.
(3) Non-satiation
.
.
b. Indifference curves
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
c. Characteristics of indifference curves
(1) Downward sloping
- If more of one received, less of the other must be
received to balance gain in satisfaction
.
(2) Infinite number of indifference curves - one point
through every point in space
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(3) Higher indifference curve => higher utility
.
.
.
(4) Indifference curves can't intersect
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
d. Slope of indifference curve
- Marginal rate of substitution (MRS) = maximum amount
of one good (Y) a consumer is willing to give up for one
additional unit of another good (X)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
Law of Diminishing Marginal
Utility - as more of a good is consumed, the extra
satisfaction received decreases
-
Indifference curves tend to be convex - as more X is
consumed, extra satisfaction received will be less => less Y needs to be given
up
-
Diminishing MRS - MRS decreases as more X consumed
-
Individuals may have different preferences - may
favor one good more than another
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e. Unusually shaped indifference curves
(1) Perfect complements - must use products in
fixed proportions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(2) Perfect substitutes - consumer considers
that products exactly the same
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(3) Economic "bads" - one product is
undesirable => less is preferred to more
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
f. Utility functions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
Ordinal utility function
- generates a ranking of market baskets
-
Cardinal utility function
- generates measures of utility, allows more precise comparison
.
2. Budget constraints
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
a. Changes in income
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
b. Changes in price
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3. Consumer choice
- Assume consumer tries to maximize utility => try to reach
highest indifference curve
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4. Revealed preference
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5. Applications
a. Rationing
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
b. Food stamps
.
.
.
.
|