B. The Theory of Environmental
Externalities
- Externality
-
benefit or cost that affects someone who is not directly involved in
the production or consumption of a good or service
- Negative
externality - negative impacts of a
market transaction affecting those not involved in the transaction
Ex. - Pollution
- Positive
externality - positive impacts of a
market transaction affecting those not involved in the transaction
Ex. - Planting trees
.
1. Negative externalities
a. No externalities
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
b. External cost
-
A cost, not necessarily monetary, that is
not reflected in a market tranaction
-
Ex. - External cost of automobiles

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
c. Internalizing environmental costs
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(1) Damage must be estimated - may not be
worthwhile if damage is small
(2) Administrative costs may outweigh tax
revenue if damage is small
(3)
Upstream tax
- tax implemented as near as possible to the point of natural resource
extraction
(4) Price elasticity of supply and demand
will affect whether consumer or producer bears the burden of the tax
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(5) Tax may have disproportionate impact
on low-income households
.
2. Positive externalities
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3. Welfare analysis
.
a. Consumer and producer surplus with no
externalities
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
b. Impact of negative externalities
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
c. Impact of Pigouvian tax
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
d. Optimal pollution
-
Level of pollution that maximizes net social
benefits
-
Different than zero - any production will
generate some pollution
-
Ecological economists would use factors
other than economics to determine optimal overall level of pollution
.
4. Property rights and the environment
-
Allocation of property rights could help
solve environmental problems without government intervention
-
Free market environmentalism - a more
complete system of property rights and expanded use of market
mechanisms is the best approach to solving issue of resource use and
pollution control
.
a. Coase Theorem
-
If property rights are well defined and
there are no transactions costs, an efficient allocation of
resources will result even if externalities exist
-
Negotiations between parties will lead to
optimal result
Ex. -
.
.
.
.
.
.
(1) Graphical analysis
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(2) Limitations
-
Assumes no transactions costs - higher when
more parties are involved
-
Free-rider effect
- incentive for people to avoid paying for a resource when the
benefits obtained are unaffected by whether they pay
-
Holdout effect
- ability of a single entity to hinder a multiparty agreement by
making disproportionate demands
.
b. Equity and distribution
-
Poor communities may not be able to pay if
rights assigned to polluter
-
Poor communities may accept payments to
raise revenue
-
Poorer communities generally bear the
heaviest burden of environmental costs
-
Environmental justice (EPA
definition) - "Environmental
justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all
people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, with
respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and policies."
-
EPA Factsheet on environmental justice
.
c. Other limitations
(1) Difficult to apply to nonhuman life
forms
(2) Future generations not considered
(3) Can't be fully extended to some
ecosystems (atmosphere, open ocean)
.
|