![]() |
Economics 308 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS |
|
|
|
| HOME | SYLLABUS | CALENDAR | ASSIGNMENTS | ABOUT PROF. GIN | |
E. Valuing the Environment
.
. 1. Total economic value
. a. Use value
. (1) Direct use value
Ex. - Wood, non-wood products, hiking, hunting . (2) Indirect use value
Ex. - Soil erosion control, flood protection, carbon storage . b. Non-use value
. (1) Option value
Ex. - Future recreation, potential pharmaceuticals . (2) Bequest value
Ex. - Forest available for future generations to use . (3) Existence value
Ex. - Welfare from just knowing a forest exists . c. Summary . . . . . . . . . . 2. Valuation techniques a. Market valuation
Ex. - Wood, fish, groundwater . b. Cost of illness method
(1) Direct costs - medical costs, foregone wages (2) Indirect costs - decreases in human capital, pain and suffering, decreases in productivity . c. Replacement cost methods
Ex. - Fertilizer to replenish soil, planting trees
. 3. Revealed preference methods
. a. Travel cost models
. . . . . . . . . . b. Hedonic pricing
. . . . .
. . . . . c. Defensive expenditures approach
Ex. - Bottled water, water purification systems . 4. Stated preference methods
- Ask respondent to state willingness to pay for an environmental improvement
. (1) Survey design (a) Open-ended - respondent asked to state maximum WTP (b) Payment card - respondent asked to choose from numerous potential WTP (c) Single-bounded - respondent asked whether they would pay a specific amount
(d) Double-bounded - respondent given one amount, and then another based on answer (e) Multiple-bounded - respondent asked whether they are willing to pay on multiple options . . (2) Sources of bias (a) Strategic bias
. (b) Yea-saying
. (c) Range bias
. (d) Protest bids
. (e) Nonresponse bias
. |