Last modified: 8 July 2014
FIF was first used in C. elegans to detect dopamine, published by Sulston et al., 1975. They got it working so reliably, apparently, that they were able to do a clonal mutant screen for FIF-deficient worms. Most others, perhaps not in the herculean mold of the legendary founders of the field, found the original protocol imposing and difficult to make reliable. I once received a photocopy of Bob Horvitz's hand-written, detailed protocol and started by transcribing the legible parts (most). The protocol is a bit intimidating, and involves a precisely-milled pair of aluminum blocks, vacuum dessication, alternating heating and cooling with a heat lamp, liquid nitrogen cooling, generating formaldehyde vapors under precise 70% humidity (generated with 33% concentrated H2SO4 - sulfuric acid) over several hours and an overnight step, etc. I've posted the Horvitz FIF protocol transcription just for fun & historical interest.
In Beth Sawin's 1996 dissertation (Horvitz lab) appears a much easier, reliable protocol for C. elegans that takes only minutes. Robyn Lints first published this protocol in the form seen below, and provided me some important pointers for making it work, which I share here along with some additional observations. So, thanks to Beth and Robyn, the rest of us can do FIF, too.
Formaldehyde-induced fluorescence
Whole animals were stained for dopamine by means of a formaldehyde-induced fluorescence (FIF) technique (Sulston et al., 1975; Jagdale and Gordon, 1994) as modified by Sawin (1996). One to five animals were placed on a microscope slide in a 5 µl drop of paraformaldehyde solution (4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M Na2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer, pH 7.2) and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. Excess liquid was wicked off with a strip of 3 MM paper and the slide was heated for 10 minutes on an aluminium block at 96-100oC, and then cooled to room temperature. A drop of glycerol and a coverslip were placed on top of the treated worms. Fluorescence was observed at X1000 with a Zeiss 487905 filter set (excitation, 395- 440 nm; emission, 470 nm long pass).
Summary version
1. 1-5 worms placed on slide in 5 µl PFA soln, 5 min RT
2. Wick away excess liquid (e.g., with 3MM paper)
3. Heat 10 min on block at 96-100oC
4. Cool to RT
5. Add one drop glycerol, coverslip
6. View with appropriate fluorescence filter
Background fluorescence is often very high, particularly from the gut. With the filter we use, cuticle and body fluorescence is yellow-green whereas dopamine cells are light blue / blue-green. As the gut fluorescence can also be more blue in color, cells within the body (such as PDE) can be more difficult to see clearly. Cells are much easier to see in the head and tail (which lack gut, of course). There is additional autofluorescence in the male tail, although it tends to be more yellow. Because the prep involves drying, the worms can be quite flattened, and so anatomical relationships may be distorted. Cells may appear in a single plane of focus (or pretty close to it). In good preps, some neurites may be seen and/or staining in the nerve ring. Using this protocol, we do NOT see green serotonin FIF, even in the NSMs (as it was first described by Horvitz et al.,1982).
Not sure how long the fluorescence lasts, but my sense is that preps should be viewed immediately. May be good for a few hours, but probably not overnight.
Lints R, Emmons SW (1999) Patterning of dopaminergic neurotransmitter identity among Caenorhabditis elegans ray sensory neurons by a TGFbeta family signaling pathway and a Hox gene. Development 126: 5819-5831.
Rivard L, Srinivasan J, Stone A, Ochoa S, Sternberg PW, Loer CM (2010) A comparison of experience-dependent locomotory behaviors and biogenic amine neurons in nematode relatives of Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Neurosci. 11: 22.
Sawin ER (1996) Genetic and cellular analysis of modulated behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sulston J, Dew M, Brenner S (1975) Dopaminergic neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol 163: 215-226.